Language You Can Use in Identity Document Application to Prove You don’t Have an SSN and Aren’t Eligible, and Never Applied for One

EDITORIAL:  The language below is provided in About SSNs and TINs On Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012, Section 9.1.  It is repeated here to provide a way to cut and paste and reuse the language in your own form.

______________________________________

“I certify under penalty of perjury from without the statutory ‘United States’ (federal territory no under the exclusive jurisdiction of any constitutional state) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746(1) the following facts:

1. I am not in possession, use, custody, or control of any government identifying number, including but not limited to a STATUTORY Social Security Number (20 C.F.R. §422.103) or STATUTORY Taxpayer Identification Number (26 U.S.C. §6109).
2. I am not eligible, and never HAVE been eligible to apply for or receive a statutory Social Security Number. The government has already defaulted and agreed with me on this fact in criminal complaints previously sent to them and not rebutted. No government can make such a  determination for me because no government can lawfully interfere with the management of my body and my absolutely owned private property without violating the Constitution.  Even if they attempted to do so, it would be knowingly and willfully untrustworthy, because the courts have repeatedly held that government employees are NOT responsible for telling the truth and that what they say, write, or publish is INADMISSIBLE as evidence.  A certification from the Social Security Administration that I am not eligible would therefore be MEANINGLESS, would not be admissible as evidence of anything in any court, and would be a clear violation of due process of law if used as a basis for making or enforcing any conclusive presumption or impair any of my constitutionally protected rights.  All such statements would also be plagued by a criminal conflict of financial interest in violation of 18 U.S.C. §208.  For proof that you can’t trust anything that any government worker says, writes, or publishes on their forms or website see:  Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf.
3. Since I now know that I am not eligible for any government “benefit” and indicating otherwise would be criminal FRAUD, for you to COMPEL me to provide any evidence demonstrating otherwise, including a government identifying number, would constitute compelling me to incriminate myself, which the Fifth Amendment forbids you to do if you really ARE a government subject to the constitution.  Therefore, by demanding that I PROVE that a private human like me not acting as a statutory “person” doesn’t have an SSN or that I ever applied for one in itself violates the Fifth Amendment. It is what lawyers call a “perjury trap” to FORCE me to admit something that is FALSE and that I do not need to admit in order to commercially benefit YOU.  See the following for legally admissible proof that those born and domiciled in states of the Union are NOT eligible for social security if you don’t believe me and rebut it within ten days or be found to AGREE and admit everything in it:  Why You Aren’t Eligible for Social Security, Form #06.001; https://sedm.org/Forms/06-AvoidingFranch/SSNotEligible.pdf.  It therefore ought to be enough to merely tell you that I am ineligible, and to respond to this request by modifying any records that conflict with this submission.  Anything more than that would be clearly unconstitutional.

“But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.”
[Jesus in Matt. 5:37, written by a FORMER tax collector]

4. I am submitting this application as a private human being protected ONLY by the Constitution and the common law.  Any attempt to assign or enforce a statutory status such as “person”, “individual”, or “taxpayer” upon me shall constitute criminal identity theft, compelled association, and a violation of my religious beliefs.  See Government Identity Theft, Form #05.046; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/GovernmentIdentityTheft.pdf
5. I am not authorized to speak or act on behalf of any government in the context of this interaction. Hence, I am not acting in the capacity of a statutory “person” or “individual” under any government civil statute.    I am also NOT the “you” referenced in the instruction of the form submitted in the context of any alleged “obligations”, because you can’t lawfully impose any duties upon non-consenting PRIVATE people such as myself without violating the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude because I don’t consent or volunteer.  Any attempt to impute or enforce the civil statutory status of “person”, “individual”, etc. is a violation of my constitutional right to not contract or associate civilly with any and every government under the First Amendment and causes the RECIPIENT to render this submission knowingly false in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001 and 18 U.S.C. §1621.
6. I as a private human and non-attorney am not qualified or even obligated to make “legal determinations” or “legal conclusions” about my civil status or the applicability of any statute to my situation beyond that specified here or in relation to any statute not specifically mentioned herein. As attorneys would say:  “Objection:  Calls for a legal conclusion”.  I claim the SAME rights as attorneys in this regard.  This includes knowing or obeying ANYTHING in any civil statute.  Yes, “citizens” are presumed to know the law but I don’t claim to BE a statutory “citizen” (8 U.S.C. §1401 or 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c)) subject to your authority and have the First Amendment right to NOT be one and to be ONLY a private human.  See Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen, Form #05.006; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhyANational.pdf.  Your application process is flawed to FORCE ME into a position to make such determinations or learn or know any statutes that don’t apply to a non-resident:

_______________________________________________________________________________

IDIOT. A person who has been without understanding from his nativity, and whom the law, therefore, presumes never likely to attain any. Shelf. Lun. 2. See Insanity. State v. Haner, 186 Iowa, 1259,173 N.W. 225; Jones v. Commonwealth, 154 Ky. 752,159 S.W. 568, 569.

IDIOTA. In the Civil Law. An unlearned, illiterate, or simple person. Calvin. A private man; one not in office.

In Common Law. An idiot or fool.

[Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 880]

_______________________________________________________________________________

“Idiot” is another word that has changed its meaning over the centuries,  although not as dramatically as “nice” once it was imported into English. The Greek “idiotes” meant simply “private individual” (from “idios,” meaning  “personal”), as opposed to a “public man,” a politician (government agent mine) or other well-known individual. (“Idios” also gave us “idiom,” one’s own way of speaking, and “idiosyncrasy,” one’s personal quirks and habits.)”

[The Word Detective:  Idiot; Downloaded 1/30/2017; SOURCE: http://www.word-detective.com/2008/03/idiot/]

_______________________________________________________________________________

“A private person cannot make constitutions or laws, nor can he with authority construe them, nor can he administer or execute [meaning OBEY or ENFORCE] them.”

[United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629, 1 S.Ct. 601, 27 L.Ed. 290 (1883)]

_______________________________________________________________________________

7. Please DO NOT advise me or especially PUNISH ME about what to put or not put on the application to which the form relates. It would be criminal witness tampering to do so, and especially if you threaten to punish or withhold the thing requested for a failure to perform any alleged obligation because it is an UNLAWFUL obligation.  It would also result in you practicing law on my behalf, which I do not consent to allow you to do and which would also be a violation of your delegation of authority order.  The ONLY thing I am willing to entertain that might change my testimony on the form is legally admissible evidence in affidavit form from a government worker signed under penalty of perjury containing only FACTS.  Such a submission should be prepared by someone within the physical jurisdiction of the local courts in the event that the facts provided are FALSE.  Otherwise, the courts have repeatedly held that all government forms, statements, and publications are UNTRUSTWORTHY, INCLUDING but not limited to anything and everything on the forms submitted herein.
8. None of the terms used on this form or the instructions are defined or exist in any government civil or criminal statute. They are useful ONLY in the PRIVATE or CONSTITUTIONAL context and not the PUBLIC or publici juris or STATUTORY contexts.  Hence, no such statutes can or do regulate or control inaccuracies on this form or may form the basis for any kind of injury or standing to sue upon any government or upon the recipient. Any assertion otherwise constitutes purposeful availment of commerce with me and a waiver of official, judicial, and sovereign immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97 and consent to be sued in STATE and not FEDERAL court.
9. Any records in the possession of any government or the recipient that are in conflict with this submission are knowingly and willfully and even criminally false and fraudulent. Such records must IMMEDIATELY be corrected.  This submission shall constitute a formal request to correct all such records.  It shall also shall constitute a criminal complaint if they are NOT corrected.  See:  18 U.S.C. §1001, 18 U.S.C. §1003, 18 U.S.C. §1028, 18 U.S.C. §1030.
10. This application does NOT constitute an “acceptance” under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) of any kind toward any “benefit” offered by any government.  Such “benefit” includes the protection of any of the civil statutes or franchises enacted by the national congress or a state of the Union.  The ONLY offer and acceptance involved in the context of this interaction is the offer of the TEMPORARY use of PRIVATE information about me to issue the identification requested.  The only “Merchant” (U.C.C. §2-104(1)) in the context of this transaction is the affiant and the recipient of this form is the “Buyer” (U.C.C. §2-103(1)).  For all purposes OTHER than this direct interaction AFTER the identification is issued, Affiant shall be a civil statutory “non-resident” who shall NOT have or retain any civil statutory status, including but not limited to “citizen”, “resident”, “driver”, “person”, “individual”, “taxpayer”, etc.  Any attempt by the Recipient or any government to impute or enforce such civil statuses shall constitute criminal identity theft and a waiver by those imputing or enforcing said statuses of official, judicial, and sovereign immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97 and the Longarm Statutes of my State and an implied consent and agreement by the recipient and his/her employer to pay TEN TIMES the monetary value that could be derived from the enforcement of said statuses or the obligations attached thereto.  Notice to the agent is notice to the principle.
11. This application may not be used for any commercial purpose that would benefit any government, including but not limited to any administrative, tax, or statutory  enforcement.  The ONLY legitimate purpose of any and every government is to benefit the beneficiaries of the public trust, which are the PRIVATE people protected by the Constitution and NOT to primarily benefit ITSELF.  You cannot serve two masters:  God and mammon.  It is a violation of my religious beliefs to contract with, do business with, or be an officer or agent of any government in the context of any government statute or anything resulting from this interaction other than that specified herein.  Judges 2:1-4.  Violation of my religious laws invites the CURSES of my God.  Remedy is provided in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (R.F.R.A.) in fulfillment of the First Amendment for any attempt to compel me to violate my sincerely held religious beliefs or practices , as documented in Delegation of Authority Order from God to Christians, Form #13.007; https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/DelOfAuthority.pdf.
12. Even if Affiant HAD consented to violate the Holy Bible by manifesting CONSENT to any government franchise or “benefit” the Declaration of Independence, which was enacted into law in 1 Stat. 1, declares that my constitutional rights are UNALIENABLE, which means that I am legally UNABLE to give them away or consent to any legal obligation that would impair them. Therefore, any presumption that I could have done so in fact and in law is not only a nullity, but cannot count as a lawful act or therefore ANY act at all cognizable in any court of law in relation to any REAL government.  A so-called “government” that makes a profitable business or a franchise out of enticing people to surrender their constitutional rights by contracting with or legally associating with it is not government at all, but a de facto private corporation and the WHORE mentioned in the Bible book of Revelation.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

‘For among My [God’s] people are found wicked [covetous public servant] men; They lie in wait as one who sets snares; They set a trap; They catch men. As a cage is full of birds, So their houses are full of deceit. Therefore they have become great and grown rich. They have grown fat, they are sleek; Yes, they surpass the deeds of the wicked; They do not plead the cause, The cause of the fatherless [or the innocent, widows, or the nontaxpayer]; Yet they prosper, And the right of the needy they do not defend. Shall I not punish them for these things?’ says the Lord. ‘Shall I not avenge Myself on such a nation as this?’

“An astonishing and horrible thing Has been committed in the land: The prophets prophesy falsely, And the priests [judges in franchise courts that worship government as a pagan deity] rule by their own power; And My people love to have it so. But what will you do in the end?”

[Jer. 5:26-31, Bible, NKJV]

_______________________________________________________________________________________

The first function of any REAL government is to protect PRIVATE rights and PRIVATE property.  That protection BEGINS with ensuring that such property is NEVER converted to PUBLIC property or PUBLIC rights, even WITH the consent of the owner.  This keeps the government in the box and removes any temptation to trick people out of their property with franchises, “words of art”, or “benefits”.  See De Facto Government Scam, Form #05.043; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DeFactoGov.pdf.

13. It is a violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to “bundle” any franchises such as Social Security with de jure constitutional functions such as passports in order to FORCE applicants into an adhesion contract that causes a surrender of any Constitutional right. It also violates the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine and results in criminal human trafficking. See 22 U.S.C. §2721.  I won’t tolerate any attempt by you to “bundle” such services.  Corporations such as Google are commonly sued for doing so, and you should be also if you continue to insist on such monopolistic and usurious practices.  Google was fined $5 BILLION dollars by the EU for such bundling with their Android operating system.
14. For the purposes of this interaction, the term “Social Security Number”, when used by any government for civil or criminal enforcement or commerical purposes to undermine the PRIVATE rights of the Affiant and Submitter, shall mean a license from the Affiant to the government or recipient under the terms of the following anti-franchise franchise:  Injury Defense Franchise and Agreement, Form #06.027; https://sedm.org/Forms/06-AvoidingFranch/InjuryDefenseFranchise.pdf.    I MUST define the term because I’m not allowed to trust anything the government says in its forms or publications, including its definitions, and I don’t want to invite or allow anyone to make any presumptions that might impair my constitutional rights or civil status.  Welcome to the Matrix, Neo.

______________________________ ______________
Signature