Female Behaviors that Contribute to Indifference by Men in Marriage and Dating

1. Introduction

As a man, these are valid reasons, but they aren’t even the most important ones.

1. Fear of gold digging woman who only marry men for their money or economic security. This tendency is far more pronounced during economic hard times.
2. Women insisting on a licensed marriage or no marriage at all and rejecting sovereign marriage. Men wanting to avoid the polygamy of marrying the state with a marriage license. Men can’t lead as God commands if they are subordinate to the state.
   Sovereign Christian Marriage, Form, #06.009
   http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Ebooks/SovChristianMarriage/SovChristianMarriage.htm
3. The distaste of most women toward freedom-minded fully informed men like those who visit this site. They want a more “normal” man, whatever THAT is. What they really mean is a useful idiot for socialist politicians. God defines “normal”, not secular society. Jesus was NOT “normal” and He’s our role model.
4. Women not going to church and being secular, forcing men to find them in bars instead. No rational man would marry a woman he met in a bar. She might go back again after they get married to cheat.
   Sexual Immorality, Family Guardian Fellowship
   https://famguardian.org/Subjects/SexualImmorality/Sex.htm#PORNOGRAPHY:
5. Sexual promiscuity of before marriage also destroys the need for commitment. Sex should only come during marriage.
6. Porn addictions by both sexes also limits the incentives to get married:
   Sexual Immorality, Section 10: Pornography, Family Guardian Fellowship
   https://famguardian.org/Subjects/SexualImmorality/Sex.htm#PORNOGRAPHY:
   

Collectively, the result of all the things talked about in this article is GENOCIDE and low birth rate. In effect, men are saying they would rather throw their sperm in a trash can and commit genocide than make a baby with a woman like the above. Every woman is an ambassador of their gender for all men. If a woman mistreats a man, then he often will refuse to trust any woman from that point on.

2. Research Backs this Up

2.1. The “Demand-Withdraw” Conflict Pattern

In clinical psychology, the dynamic where one partner pushes for change through criticism or pressure, leading the other partner to emotionally retreat or show indifference, is known as the Demand-Withdraw pattern.

• The Prevalence: Longitudinal studies on marital interaction show that the Wife-Demand / Husband-Withdraw sequence is one of the most frequently observed conflict structures in heterosexual relationships (Christensen & Heavey, 1990; Holley et al., 2010).
• The Mechanism: Research demonstrates that when requests for change are framed through criticism, complaining, or continuous pressure, men are statistically far more likely to respond with passive inaction, defensiveness, or complete emotional withdrawal rather than engagement.
• Power & Desire for Change: Studies indicate that the partner who feels lower control over a situation demands, while the partner who feels overwhelmed or satisfied with the status quo withdraws to protect autonomy.

2.2. “Stonewalling” and Physiological Flooding (The Gottman Institute)

Dr. John Gottman’s decades of observational research at the University of Washington tracked thousands of couples to determine which communication habits predict marital breakdown.

• 85% Male Representation: Gottman’s data revealed that approximately 85% of “stonewallers” (partners who become emotionally indifferent, shut down, tune out, or act unresponsive during discussions) in heterosexual marriages are men.
• Physiological “Flooding”: The statistics show this disengagement is driven by physiological reactivity. During high-conflict or highly critical interactions, men’s heart rates frequently spike above 100 bpm, triggering a “fight-or-flight” response. Because this state is physically uncomfortable, men emotionally check out as an involuntary coping strategy to regulate their nervous system.
• Predictive Value: Gottman identified Stonewalling (along with Criticism, Contempt, and Defensiveness) as one of the “Four Horsemen” that predict relationship dissolution with over 90% accuracy when uncorrected.

2.3. The 5:1 Ratio of Positive to Negative Interactions

Articles discussing male indifference often cite men feeling unappreciated, criticized, or disrespected as a major driver of checking out.

• The Magic Ratio: Gottman’s research found that in stable, healthy marriages, there are at least 5 positive interactions for every 1 negative interaction during conflict (and a 20:1 ratio during everyday life).
• Tipping Point: When the ratio drops—meaning criticism, disapproval, or nagging outweighs praise, gratitude, and physical affection—men statistically show a steep decline in relationship effort and emotional availability, leading to behavioral indifference.

2.4. Divorce Initiation Statistics

Sociological studies provide context on how emotional distance and dissatisfaction manifest in actual relationship endings.

• 70% Female-Initiated: According to research presented by the American Sociological Association (Rosenfeld, 2015), approximately 69% to 70% of divorces in heterosexual U.S. marriages are initiated by women.
• The Underlying Dynamic: Sociological analysis suggests that women are more likely to express overt dissatisfaction with relationship quality or emotional connection early on. When those complaints do not lead to desired changes—or when they trigger a cycle of male emotional retreat—the relationship often degrades until one or both partners fully disengage.

2.5. Summary Table

Dynamic / Factor	Key Research Statistic	Psychological Outcome
Stonewalling / Withdrawal	~85% of stonewallers during conflict are men (Gottman Institute)	Male emotional shutdown as a defense mechanism against physiological overload.
Demand-Withdraw Cycle	Significant primary conflict structure in heterosexual couples (Christensen & Heavey, 1990)	Critical complaints trigger defensive retreat, creating a cycle of increasing female frustration and male apathy.
Positive-to-Negative Ratio	Must maintain a 5:1 ratio during conflict (Gottman)	High levels of criticism or low appreciation lead directly to reduced effort and intimacy.
Divorce Initiation	~70% initiated by women (ASA, 2015)	Unresolved cycles of demand and withdrawal eventually culminate in formal separation.

2.5. References

Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73

Cited by: 1677

Holley, S. R., Sturm, V. E., & Levenson, R. W. (2010). Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(5), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918361003712145

Cited by: 125

More at:

Family Law, Dating, Marriage, and Divorce, Family Guardian Fellowship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/FamilyLaw/FamilyLaw.htm