Proof of facts: The oath of office for the “U.S. person” civil status

From Statutes at Large, Volume XXXI, March 3, 1901

I think that’s why they can create the office with nothing more than a penalty of perjury statement

Fifth. Wherever an oat is required an affirmation in judicial form… deemed sufficient I think that’s why they can create the office with nothing more than a penalty of perjury statement

The penalty of perjury statement on tax forms constitutes the oath.

The oath CREATES the damn partnership!

And “person” is nothing but a corporation or a partnership WITH that corporation: U.S. Inc!

And here is what they say about volunteering for the D.C. domiciled U.S. person office:

Individuals are under no compulsion to accept federal employment or reside in the District of Columbia. Government employees residing in the District are not taxable in their respective States of former residence upon income earned in the District. Domicile in the District is not inconsistent with political status in one of the States. Most Government employees remain in the District after retirement.

[District of Columbia v. Murphy, 314 U.S. 441 (1941);
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9869153409131399521]

File as a nonresident alien, avoid the “U.S. person” usufruct and all US sourced income, and the state gets a goose egg!!

What is a U.S. person election called again? A usufruct….right?

Yes. That’s it! That’s the scam. The U.S. person property is domiciled in DC! The status….regardless of where the “citizen” resides.

Any “citizen” can elect into the usufruct!

It’s not about the domicile of the “citizen” but the situs of the property he has surety for–the U.S. person.

You even said, it’s not a tax on the officer, but his office. Any “citizen” can volunteer to be an “officer.”

The property situs (domicile) is DC. The “United States” in its geographical sense bumps the territories and possessions out to keep the confines of the scheme federal and not national in nature. The “citizen” of 26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c) is the broadest category of domestic participants. See:

26 C.F.R. 301.7701-7

26 C.F.R. 301.77-1(b)-1(b)

More on usufructs at:

Property View of Income Taxation Course, Form #12.045
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/PropertyViewOfIncomeTax.pdf