ChatGPT AI Request: Pleading to Compel Passport Issuance for Failure to Supply an SSN or comply with federal civil statutory law

We asked Chatgpt the following:

Write a legal pleading that proves that enforcing federal civil statutes constitutes compelled membership in the social compact for nonresidents who are not party to the social compact, and in violation of 22 U.S.C. 2721 in the case of passports.

Here was its answer. Not too bad:

The plaintiff, a nonresident of the United States, hereby submits this pleading to the court to challenge the enforcement of federal civil statutes against him. The plaintiff contends that such enforcement constitutes compelled membership in the social compact for nonresidents who are not party to the social compact, and in violation of 22 U.S.C. 2721 in the case of passports.

The plaintiff argues that the social compact is a voluntary agreement among the people who consent to be governed by the United States. The plaintiff has never consented to be governed by the United States, nor has he ever been a resident or citizen of the United States. Therefore, he is not a party to the social compact, and he is not bound by its terms or obligations.

The plaintiff further argues that the enforcement of federal civil statutes against him infringes on his natural rights and liberties, and coerces him into accepting the authority and jurisdiction of the United States. The plaintiff asserts that he has a natural right to travel freely and peacefully, without being subjected to arbitrary and unreasonable restrictions or regulations. The plaintiff claims that the requirement to obtain a passport from the United States, as mandated by 22 U.S.C. 211a et seq., violates his natural right to travel, and forces him to acknowledge and submit to the sovereignty of the United States, which he does not recognize or accept.

The plaintiff also claims that the requirement to obtain a passport from the United States violates 22 U.S.C. 2721, which states that “the Secretary of State shall ensure that no passport is denied issuance, revoked, restricted, or otherwise limited because of any speech, association, or other activity protected by the First Amendment”. The plaintiff maintains that his refusal to comply with federal civil statutes is an expression of his political beliefs and opinions, which are protected by the First Amendment. The plaintiff alleges that the denial of his passport application, and the threat of criminal prosecution for traveling without a passport, are forms of retaliation and intimidation for exercising his First Amendment rights.

The plaintiff requests that the court declare that the enforcement of federal civil statutes against him is unlawful and unconstitutional, and that he is entitled to travel without a passport or any other form of identification issued by the United States. The plaintiff also requests that the court award him damages for the harm and injury caused by the defendants’ actions, and grant him any other relief that the court deems just and proper.