REBUTTAL: U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar Admits at Trump Inauguration on 1/20/25 CIVIL/DOMICILED Citizen**+D is a PUBLIC OFFICE!

During the Trump Inauguration held on 1/20/25 in Washington, DC, U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar admits that a CIVIL/DOMICILED Citizen**+D is a PUBLIC OFFICE. This admission repeats what Obama said in his Farewell Address, Exhibit #01.018. It is also consistent with other Obama statements in Exhibits #01.013, 01.017.

President Obama Admits in His Farewell Address that “citizen” is a public office, Exhibit #01.018
https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX01.018-39-45-20170110-Obama%20Farewell%20Speech.mp4

Here is exactly what she said starting at 1:12:

“President Kennedy, who at one point worked as a Senator in this building and would often walk through this very rotunda once said:

In a democracy, every citizen, regardless of interest in politics holds office. Every one of us is in a position of responsibility [CIVIL obligation]. With that responsibility of citizenship comes an obligation not to seek out malice, as President Lincoln once reminded us, but to view others with a generosity of spirit despite our differences. With that responsibility of leadership comes an obligation to stand our ground when we must, and find common ground when we can.”

[U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar at Trump Inauguration on 1/20/25 admits that CIVIL/DOMICILED “citizen**+D” is a Public Office, Exhibit #01.028;
https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX01.028-TrumpInaugCitizenOffice-20250121.mp4]

There is a HUGE glaring cognitive dissonance in what she is saying. Did you catch it? Below is an itemization of the ORWELLIAN DOUBLESPEAK coming out of her mouth, in case you didn’t catch it:

1. The Thirteenth Amendment forbids involuntary servitude in the case of human beings but not in the case of fictional creations of Congress such as “persons” and “citizens”.

2. Fictional creations of Congress, also called LEGAL STATUS or CIVIL STATUS or an OFFICE:

2.1. Are created in the DEFINITION section of a civil statute.

2.2. Are PROPERTY of Congress. Anything Congress creates it literally OWNS as property.

2.3. If you ask for the status, then they get to make RULES to regulate your behavior while exercising the PRIVILEGES of the OFFICE or STATUS.

For confirmation of the above, see:

Hierarchy of Sovereignty: The Power to Create is the Power to Tax, Family Guardian Fellowship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Remedies/PowerToCreate.htm

3. If you as a human being owe an obligation as a “citizen” to anyone or anything that you didn’t consent to in some fashion, then you are a slave.

4. Since the “citizen” she is referring to HAS an obligation, then:

4.1. It must not be a human being . . .AND

4.2. You must VOLUNTEER by claiming or adopting the status or office to owe the obligation. By VOLUNTEERING, you become SURETY for the obligations of the office or status.

5. The METHOD of volunteering for the CIVIL STATUTORY “citizen**+D” office or status is a CIVIL STATUTORY domicile within the jurisdiction of the government that legislatively CREATED the office. If it is a NATIONAL office, the OFFICE, but not necessarily the OFFICER must be domiciled within the exclusively jurisdiction of Congress. See:

Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Domicile.pdf

6. She said the “citizen” is an office that has OBLIGATIONS but she DID NOT say TO WHOM the obligations are owed. In fact:

6.1. The obligations are NOT owed to PRIVATE people with PURELY PRIVATE and CONSTITUTIONAL rights, ironically. These people have NO PROTECTION under the CIVIL STATUTORY franchise CODES, because all such codes only protect CLUB MEMBERS of the Social CIVIL compact, which is a PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION. See:

Self, Family, Church, Local Self Governance, and Private Membership Associations (PMAs), Section 2: Private Membership Associations (PMAs), SEDM
https://sedm.org/self-family-church-and-local-self-governance/#2._Private_Membership_Associations

6.2. If the Courts of the Executive Branch ENFORCES the SOCIAL COMPACT and PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION (PMA) club rules against NON-MEMBERS, then they are:

6.2.1 CRIMINALLY simulating legal process.

6.2.2 Engaging in “injustice”, because justice is the right to be LEFT ALONE. This is CERTAINLY NOT “equal justice under law” as she calls it. See:

What is “Justice”?, Form #05.050
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhatIsJustice.pdf

6.2.3. In effect, engaging in what the legal community refers to as “pseudo law”, which in this case is enforcing laws against people who are not subject to it under a DEMONIC process of criminal identity theft as documented in:

Government Identity Theft, Form #05.046
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/GovernmentIdentityTheft.pdf

6.2. The OBLIGATIONS are owed to the POLITICIANS and the GOVERNMENT and anyone ELSE serving in a SIMILAR “citizen**+D” office under the umbrella of the CIVIL CODE, which we call the “social compact” on this website. In that respect, she is flipping the hierarchy of sovereignty UPSIDE DOWN and making the PEOPLE serve the GOVERNMENT, which is the OPPOSITE of why government was created to begin with! This turns the PUBLIC trust into a SHAM trust. That “social compact” is described in:

The REAL Social Compact, Form #08.030
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/TheRealSocialCompact.pdf

6.3. Members of that “social compact”, which is a PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION (PMA) are what we refer to as “the collective”. Collectivism not only destroys private property and private rights, but completely destroys any reason to be a “citizen” to begin with, which is the PROTECTION of PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights. See:

Collectivism and How to Resist It Course, Form #12.024
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/Collectivism.pdf

7. The irony here is that:

7.1. NONE of the people INSIDE the government OTHER than the peon “citizens” who are surety for the irresponsible behavior of politicians are responsible for ANYTHING! The entire government is an ANARCHIST limited liability company that, like any MAFIA, only protects itself. See the proof for your self:

Your Irresponsible, Lawless, and Anarchist Beast Government, Form #05.054
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf

7.2. The reason for WANTING to BECOME a citizen is to protect PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights, which are recognized in the Bill of Rights, and yet to DO SO, you must in essence GIVE UP all those rights and exchange them for CIVIL STATUTORY PRIVILEGES:

“It is the greatest absurdity to suppose it [would be] in the power of one, or any number of men, at the entering into society, to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights; when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution, is for the support, protection, and defense of those very rights; the principal of which … are life, liberty, and property. If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.”

[Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists, November 20, 1772; http://www.foundingfatherquotes.com/father/quotes/2]

8. The POLITICAL status indicative of “entering into society” is that of a “citizen*”, meaning a NATIONAL having NATIONALITY.  See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 164 (1874).
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5117525999793250938

9. CIVIL status, on the other hand, is indicative of:

9.1. LEGALLY associating with a specific municipal jurisdiction.

9.2. Seeking the privileges associated with the CIVIL LAWS of that jurisdiction.

9.3. Seeking a civil statutory status of “citizen” (national) or “resident” (alien).

9.4. Agreeing to PAY for the delivery of the privileges you seek through income taxation.

9.5. Joining the Private Membership Association (PMA) called “the State”, which is legally defined as a people occupying a territory.

10. “Civil status” is described in:

11. The implication of the above is that NO CIVIL privileges can attach to the POLITICAL status of “citizen*”. For a description of what “privilege” means, see:

12. The reason that no CIVIL privileges can attach to the POLITICAL status of “citizen*” is that privileges are the main method of surrendering natural or constitutional rights.

“The State in such cases exercises no greater right than an individual may exercise over the use of his own property when leased or loaned to others. The conditions upon which the privilege shall be enjoyed being stated or implied in the legislation authorizing its grant, no right is, of course, impaired by their enforcement. The recipient of the privilege, in effect, stipulates to comply with the conditions. It matters not how limited the privilege conferred, its acceptance implies an assent to the regulation of its use and the compensation for it.”

[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876)]

“But when Congress creates a statutory right [a “privilege” or “public right” in this case, such as a “trade or business”], it clearly has the discretion, in defining that right, to create presumptions, or assign burdens of proof, or prescribe remedies; it may also provide that persons seeking to vindicate that right must do so before particularized tribunals created to perform the specialized adjudicative tasks related to that right. FN35 Such provisions do, in a sense, affect the exercise of judicial power, but they are also incidental to Congress’ power to define the right that it has created. No comparable justification exists, however, when the right being adjudicated is not of congressional creation. In such a situation, substantial inroads into functions that have traditionally been performed by the Judiciary cannot be characterized merely as incidental extensions of Congress’ power to define rights that it has created. Rather, such inroads suggest unwarranted encroachments upon the judicial power of the United States, which our Constitution reserves for Art. III courts.”

[Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 102 S.Ct. 2858 (1983)]

13. Because no privileges can attach to the POLITICAL “citizen*”, the status ALSO cannot be a privilege, and therefore cannot be a STATUTORY civil status.

14. Since the income tax is imposed upon “citizens**+D” and “residents” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1, then these parties, BY DEFINITION cannot be people with natural or constitutional rights because the CIVIL status therein is treated as a taxable privilege in that context.  See:

15. The only way you can be a “citizen*” WITHOUT privileges is therefore to be so in a POLITICAL rather than CIVIL STATUTORY context.

16. The above is why a “privilege” is defined as a private or special right imputed or assigned to those who are OTHER than “citizens*”:

“Privilege. A particular benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company, or class beyond the common advantages of other citizens.”

[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1197; SOURCE: https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/privilege.htm]

17. For the purposes of the above, “privileges”, “civil status”, and “benefits” are synonymous with a CIVIL status under any act of the government.  All civil statutory law is law for government and not PRIVATE people:

18. The above concepts are ALSO why it is a maxim of the common law that you have a right to NOT receive, and by implication NOT PAY FOR, a “benefit”/privilege that you DO NOT WANT:

“Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.”

“Potest quis renunciare pro se, et suis, juri quod pro se introductum est. A man may relinquish, for himself and his heirs, a right which was introduced for his own benefit. See 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 83.”

“Quae inter alios acta sunt nemini nocere debent, sed prodesse possunt. Transactions between strangers may benefit, but cannot injure, persons who are parties to them. 6 Co. 1.”

[Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856; SOURCE: https://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htm]

19. There is nothing inherently sinister about:

19.1. Having a political status.

19.2. Being a “national”.

19.3. Calling yourself a Fourteenth Amendment “citizen of the United States***” who has nationality.

20. Any attempt to abuse equivocation to make CIVIL STATUS and POLITICAL status appear synonymous is an act of CRIMINAL identity theft engineered to procure your consent usually INVISIBLY.  See:

21. If you would like to learn MORE about the ORWELLIAN DOUBLESPEAK by Senator Amy Klobuchar about being a “citizen” and “citizenship”, see:

1. The Biggest Lie You’ve Ever Been Sold, SEDM
   https://sedm.org/the-biggest-lie-youve-ever-been-sold/
2. The Jones Plantation, Larken Rose
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8Rj5xkDPk
3. The Jones Plantation Website, Larken Rose
   https://jonesplantationfilm.com
4. The Jones Plantation– Movie
   https://ww1.m4uhd.net/watch-movie-yy86t-jones-plantation-2023